Pixelorama vs Material Maker
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Pixelorama
8.02D sprite editor made with the Godot Engine
Material Maker
8.0Procedural material authoring and 3D painting tool based on the Godot Engine
| Metric | Pixelorama | Material Maker |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 67 | 13 |
| 90-day Installs | 138 | 47 |
| 365-day Installs | 388 | 202 |
| Version | 1.1.10 | 1.6 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 9.2K | 5.2K |
| GitHub Forks | 474 | 309 |
| Open Issues | 81 | 286 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | GDScript | GDScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 21, 2020 | Jun 9, 2024 |
Reviews
Pixelorama
Pixelorama is a feature-rich, open-source pixel art editor built with Godot Engine, offering tools for creating sprites, tiles, and animations. It's a versatile tool for both casual creators and professional artists, available across multiple platforms.
Pixelorama is a 2D sprite editor that allows users to create and edit pixel art, including sprites, tiles, and animations.
Pros
- + Open-source and MIT-licensed, fostering community contributions.
- + Comprehensive feature set for pixel art creation and editing.
- + Cross-platform availability, including macOS, Windows, Linux, and the web.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, requiring manual checks for new versions.
- - Performance issues, such as high CPU usage and slow preview playback.
Material Maker
Material Maker is a powerful, open-source tool for creating procedural materials and 3D painted textures, offering a cost-effective alternative to professional software like Substance Designer. It's ideal for artists and developers in game development, VFX, or 3D modeling who need a flexible and customizable solution.
Material Maker is a procedural textures authoring and 3D model painting tool based on the Godot game engine.
Pros
- + Open-source and MIT licensed, offering full customization
- + Rich set of features for procedural texture creation and 3D painting
- + Active development with frequent updates and a strong community
- + Cost-effective alternative for indie developers and small studios
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, requiring manual installation
- - Some UI elements, like font size, may not scale well on high-resolution displays