Zalo vs WhatsApp
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Zalo
6.0Messaging and calling application
Native desktop client for WhatsApp
| Metric | Zalo | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 86 | 4.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 218 | 13.0K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.1K | 61.5K |
| Version | 26.10.11 | 26.41.28 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 2.2K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 495 |
| Open Issues | — | 170 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | — | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 2y ago |
| First Seen | Jul 3, 2019 | Apr 11, 2015 |
Reviews
Zalo
Zalo is a popular messaging and calling application primarily used in Vietnam, offering features like chat, voice, and video calls. It also integrates with ZaloPay, a digital payment service, making it a comprehensive communication and financial tool for users in Vietnam.
Zalo is a messaging and calling application that supports chat, voice, and video calls, along with integration with ZaloPay.
Pros
- + Popular and widely used in Vietnam, making it a key communication tool in the region.
- + Integration with ZaloPay offers additional financial services, enhancing its utility.
- + Supports essential communication features including messaging, voice, and video calls.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, which may require users to manually check for updates.
- - Primarily focused on the Vietnamese market, limiting its appeal outside the region.
WhatsApp offers a native desktop experience, enabling users to communicate seamlessly on their computers. It provides messaging, voice, and video calls, benefiting those who prefer desktop use without needing a phone.
WhatsApp is the native desktop client allowing communication through the app on a computer.
Pros
- + Free to use
- + Seamless integration with mobile app
- + Support for voice and video calls
Cons
- - Privacy concerns
- - Risk of user bans