Zalo vs Signal
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Zalo
6.0Messaging and calling application
Signal
8.0Instant messaging application focusing on security
| Metric | Zalo | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 80 | 2.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 274 | 9.4K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.2K | 35.4K |
| Version | 26.4.10 | 8.8.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 28.4K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 6.7K |
| Open Issues | — | 476 |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Jul 3, 2019 | Nov 1, 2017 |
Reviews
Zalo
Zalo is a popular messaging and calling application primarily used in Vietnam, offering features like chat, voice, and video calls. It also integrates with ZaloPay, a digital payment service, making it a comprehensive communication and financial tool for users in Vietnam.
Zalo is a messaging and calling application that supports chat, voice, and video calls, along with integration with ZaloPay.
Pros
- + Popular and widely used in Vietnam, making it a key communication tool in the region.
- + Integration with ZaloPay offers additional financial services, enhancing its utility.
- + Supports essential communication features including messaging, voice, and video calls.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature, which may require users to manually check for updates.
- - Primarily focused on the Vietnamese market, limiting its appeal outside the region.
Signal
Signal is a privacy-focused instant messaging app with end-to-end encryption, designed for secure communication. It supports text, voice, and video calls, benefiting users who prioritize security and anonymity.
Signal provides secure, encrypted messaging and communication services for text, voice, and video calls.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures secure communication
- + User-friendly interface with strong privacy features
- + Regular updates and active development
Cons
- - Persistent issues with call functionality
- - Lack of desktop app features like read receipts
- - MacOS app is a web wrapper, not a native experience