ximalaya vs Pocket Casts
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
ximalaya
6.0Platform for podcasting and audio-sharing
Pocket Casts
8.0Podcast platform
| Metric | ximalaya | Pocket Casts |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 10 | 64 |
| 90-day Installs | 27 | 267 |
| 365-day Installs | 141 | 943 |
| Version | 4.0.9,GAqhp50NEDQ4ACAAAARFGWqw,0956,E4,54 | 2.2.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 294 | 147 |
| GitHub Forks | 97 | 19 |
| Open Issues | 15 | 5 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2y ago | 7y ago |
| First Seen | Dec 24, 2019 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
ximalaya
Ximalaya is a major platform for podcasting and audio-sharing, particularly popular in China. It offers a vast library of Chinese podcasts, allowing users to browse, listen, and download content. Ideal for those interested in Chinese audio content.
Ximalaya serves as a platform for discovering, listening to, and downloading podcasts and audio content, especially from Chinese sources.
Pros
- + Extensive library of Chinese podcasts and audio content.
- + Features include browsing, searching, and downloading.
- + Free to use.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature.
- - Technical issues reported in the GitHub repository.
Pocket Casts
Pocket Casts is a podcast platform offering features like syncing across devices, offline listening, and an open-source community. It benefits podcast enthusiasts and content creators with its comprehensive tools and accessibility.
Pocket Casts allows users to listen to, subscribe to, download, and manage podcasts efficiently.
Pros
- + Free to use
- + Open-source with community contributions
- + Cross-device synchronization
Cons
- - Low GitHub activity
- - Last commit in 2018