Waterfox vs Brave
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Waterfox
7.5Web browser
Brave
8.0Web browser focusing on privacy
| Metric | Waterfox | Brave |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browsers | Browsers |
| AI Score | 7.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 252 | 7.6K |
| 90-day Installs | 756 | 24.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 3.0K | 86.7K |
| Version | 6.6.12 | 1.89.145.0 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 216 | 21.9K |
| GitHub Forks | 40 | 3.0K |
| Open Issues | 134 | 9.9K |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Jan 29, 2015 | Oct 21, 2018 |
Reviews
Waterfox
Waterfox is a fast and private web browser, designed for users seeking a customizable and legacy-supported experience. It retains XUL support and offers enhanced privacy features, making it ideal for power users and developers.
Waterfox is a web browser optimized for speed and privacy, offering a fork of Firefox with legacy features.
Pros
- + High speed and performance
- + Strong focus on privacy and customization
- + Support for legacy XUL extensions
Cons
- - Niche appeal may limit feature development
- - Some users report issues with UI changes and tab management
Brave
Brave is a privacy-focused web browser that blocks ads and trackers by default, offering features like Brave Shields and a built-in ad blocker. It supports a variety of platforms and emphasizes user privacy, making it ideal for those concerned about online tracking.
Brave is a web browser designed to enhance privacy and security by blocking trackers and ads, while providing users with a customizable browsing experience.
Pros
- + Strong focus on privacy with features like ad blocking and tracker prevention.
- + Support for decentralized technologies like IPFS.
- + Customizable and user-friendly interface.
Cons
- - Some users may find the browser's security audits to be a concern, though they are actively being addressed.
- - Lack of support for vertical tabs, which some users have requested.