Waterfox Classic vs Mozilla Firefox
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Waterfox Classic
7.0Web browser
Mozilla Firefox
8.0Web browser
| Metric | Waterfox Classic | Mozilla Firefox |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browsers | Browsers |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 1 | 17.3K |
| 90-day Installs | 5 | 49.6K |
| 365-day Installs | 34 | 202.2K |
| Version | 2022.11 | 150.0.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 216 | 271 |
| GitHub Forks | 40 | 111 |
| Open Issues | 134 | 522 |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | 5y ago |
| First Seen | Oct 28, 2019 | Apr 10, 2012 |
Reviews
Waterfox Classic
Waterfox Classic is a web browser based on an older version of Firefox, designed for users who prefer legacy features or require compatibility with older extensions. It offers customization options and is tailored for those who need a stable, traditional browsing experience.
Waterfox Classic provides a web browsing experience based on an older version of Firefox, suitable for users who need legacy features or extensions.
Pros
- + Ideal for users who rely on older Firefox extensions and features
- + Highly customizable with a focus on legacy system compatibility
- + Actively maintained with regular updates despite open issues
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates may pose security and functionality risks
- - Numerous open issues suggest ongoing bugs and areas needing attention
Mozilla Firefox
Mozilla Firefox is a popular web browser known for its focus on privacy, security, and customization. It offers features like tracking protection, password management, and extensive extension support, making it ideal for users who value control over their online experience.
Mozilla Firefox is a web browser that emphasizes privacy, security, and customization.
Pros
- + Strong focus on privacy and security with features like tracking protection and password management.
- + Highly customizable with a wide range of extensions and themes available.
- + Cross-platform support with consistent functionality across different operating systems.
Cons
- - Performance issues on macOS due to Apple's browser rules.
- - Can feel bloated with its extensive feature set, which may overwhelm some users.