Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

VNote vs Obsidian

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

VNote

8.0
Productivity

Note-taking platform

Obsidian

8.0
Productivity

Knowledge base that works on top of a local folder of plain text Markdown files

Metric VNote Obsidian
Category Productivity Productivity
AI Score 8.0 8.0
30-day Installs 10 26.2K
90-day Installs 26 61.9K
365-day Installs 92 131.4K
Version 3.20.1 1.12.7
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 12.7K 15.5K
GitHub Forks 1.3K 5.6K
Open Issues 686 1.5K
License LGPL-3.0
Language C++
Last GitHub Commit 1mo ago 1mo ago
First Seen Aug 9, 2023 May 27, 2020

Reviews

VNote

VNote is an open-source note-taking platform with Markdown support and PlantUML integration, ideal for programmers and those seeking a powerful, native C++-based solution. It offers a pleasant user experience with customization options and wiki-style organization.

VNote provides a Markdown-enabled note-taking experience with support for PlantUML diagrams and wiki-style navigation.

Pros

  • + Open-source with a permissive LGPL-3.0 license
  • + Native C++ implementation for performance and customization
  • + Markdown support with syntax highlighting and PlantUML integration

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature
  • - Limited recent installs (7 in 30 days)
  • - High number of open issues may indicate ongoing development or maintenance needs

Obsidian

Obsidian is a powerful knowledge base that organizes plain text Markdown files, offering extensive plugins and integrations. It benefits productivity-focused users who prefer a flexible, local-first approach to note-taking and information management.

Obsidian is a knowledge base that organizes and enhances plain text Markdown files with rich features and plugins.

Pros

  • + Works with local Markdown files, offering flexibility and control
  • + Extensive plugin ecosystem for customization
  • + Introduction of CLI and TUI enhances accessibility

Cons

  • - Steep learning curve for new users
  • - Limited cloud sync features compared to competitors