ViDL for Mac vs Open Video Downloader
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
ViDL for Mac
5.0GUI frontend for youtube-dl
Open Video Downloader
7.0Cross-platform GUI for youtube-dl made in Electron and node.js
| Metric | ViDL for Mac | Open Video Downloader |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 10 | 68 |
| 90-day Installs | 36 | 230 |
| 365-day Installs | 122 | 907 |
| Version | 1.0.2 | 3.2.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 7.8K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 576 |
| Open Issues | — | 38 |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 18, 2020 | Aug 19, 2021 |
Reviews
ViDL for Mac
ViDL is a user-friendly macOS application that provides a graphical interface for downloading YouTube videos using youtube-dl. It offers features like video and audio extraction, playlist support, and integration with macOS services, making it ideal for users who prefer a GUI over command-line tools.
ViDL serves as a graphical user interface for youtube-dl, enabling users to download YouTube videos and audio files directly from their Mac.
Pros
- + User-friendly graphical interface for video downloading.
- + Supports video and audio extraction, as well as playlist downloads.
- + Native macOS integration for a seamless experience.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Limited community support and recent development activity.
Open Video Downloader
Open Video Downloader is a modern, cross-platform video downloader built with Rust, Tauri, Vue, and TypeScript. It provides a user-friendly GUI for downloading videos from YouTube and other platforms, ideal for media enthusiasts and content creators.
Enables users to download videos from various platforms using youtube-dl through a graphical interface.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support with a modern, intuitive UI
- + Actively maintained with frequent updates
- + Open-source and community-driven
Cons
- - Occasional reliability issues reported by users
- - Can be resource-intensive due to Electron-based architecture