UniClipboard vs CrossPaste
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
UniClipboard
8.0Cross-device clipboard syncing tool
CrossPaste
8.0Universal Pasteboard Across Devices
| Metric | UniClipboard | CrossPaste |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 24 | 53 |
| 90-day Installs | 24 | 182 |
| 365-day Installs | 24 | 480 |
| Version | 0.17.1 | 2.1.5.2343 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 745 | 1.9K |
| GitHub Forks | 38 | 80 |
| Open Issues | 80 | 26 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | 4d ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 30, 2026 | Sep 3, 2024 |
Reviews
UniClipboard
UniClipboard offers real-time cross-device clipboard syncing with a focus on privacy and local-first operation. It ensures end-to-end encryption without relying on cloud services, benefiting users who prioritize data security and independence.
UniClipboard synchronizes clipboard content across devices in real-time using peer-to-peer technology.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures privacy
- + No cloud dependency for users without accounts
- + Real-time syncing across multiple devices
Cons
- - No auto-update feature available
- - 80 open issues may indicate areas needing improvement
CrossPaste
CrossPaste offers a universal clipboard experience, syncing text and images across devices and operating systems. Its key features include seamless cross-device pasteboard synchronization and support for multiple platforms, benefiting users who frequently switch between devices.
Synchronizes clipboard content across devices, enabling users to paste text or images anywhere.
Pros
- + Cross-device clipboard synchronization for seamless content sharing.
- + Open-source AGPL license promoting transparency and customization.
- + Active development with frequent updates and issue resolutions.
Cons
- - Known issues with Windows compatibility that require attention.
- - Manual updates required as there's no auto-update feature.