tunarr vs OBS
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
tunarr
8.0Create your own live TV channels from media on Plex, Jellyfin, Emby
OBS
8.0Open-source software for live streaming and screen recording
| Metric | tunarr | OBS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 12 | 4.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 12 | 13.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 12 | 46.4K |
| Version | 1.3.8 | 32.1.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 2.4K | 70.8K |
| GitHub Forks | 104 | 9.1K |
| Open Issues | 139 | 1.1K |
| License | Zlib | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 14d ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 20, 2026 | Jul 16, 2014 |
Reviews
tunarr
Tunarr lets you create custom live TV channels using media from Plex, Jellyfin, or Emby, offering a classic TV experience with your own content. It's ideal for users looking to organize and stream their personal media collections as live channels.
Tunarr enables the creation of live TV channels from media stored on Plex, Jellyfin, or Emby servers.
Pros
- + Supports multiple media platforms including Plex, Jellyfin, and Emby
- + Actively maintained with frequent updates and a responsive developer community
- + Strong open-source backing with a large GitHub following
Cons
- - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
- - High number of open issues may indicate areas needing attention
OBS
OBS is a versatile, open-source tool for live streaming and screen recording, offering extensive customization and plugin support. It's ideal for content creators, gamers, and developers seeking a free, flexible solution for video production.
Enables live streaming and screen recording with customizable settings and third-party plugins.
Pros
- + Open-source with active community support
- + Highly customizable with plugin ecosystem
- + Free and widely adopted across multiple platforms
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Occasional bugs due to its complexity