Transmit vs Flying Carpet
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Transmit
8.0File transfer application
Flying Carpet
7.0File transfer over ad-hoc wifi
| Metric | Transmit | Flying Carpet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 334 | 9 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.1K | 19 |
| 365-day Installs | 4.2K | 92 |
| Version | 5.11.6 | 9.0.4,9.0.0 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 5.0K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 235 |
| Open Issues | — | 19 |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 31, 2020 |
Reviews
Transmit
Transmit is a feature-rich file transfer application designed for efficient uploading, downloading, and management of files across various servers and cloud storage services. Its user-friendly interface, support for multiple protocols, and integration with cloud services make it a valuable tool for professionals and developers who need reliable file transfer capabilities.
Transmit enables users to transfer files using protocols like FTP, SFTP, and WebDAV, as well as manage cloud storage services.
Pros
- + User-friendly interface with a polished design.
- + Support for multiple file transfer protocols and cloud integration.
- + Regular updates and active development.
Cons
- - Higher price point compared to competitors.
- - May lack some advanced features found in alternatives like Cyberduck.
Flying Carpet
Flying Carpet is a cross-platform file transfer application that enables encrypted sharing over ad-hoc Wi-Fi without requiring a network infrastructure. It supports multiple operating systems, including macOS, iOS, Android, Linux, and Windows, making it ideal for users who need seamless file sharing between devices in close proximity.
Enables encrypted file transfer between devices over ad-hoc Wi-Fi without requiring a network infrastructure.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support for multiple operating systems.
- + Encrypted file transfer ensures data security.
- + No network infrastructure required for operation.
Cons
- - Limited recent installs suggest lower adoption rates.
- - Past issues with Android installation and functionality.