Tracexy vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Tracexy
7.0Inspect network sessions, protocols, processes, and packet evidence
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | Tracexy | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 50 | 3.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 50 | 10.5K |
| 365-day Installs | 50 | 50.6K |
| Version | 0.9.1,16 | 4.6.9 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | — | 2 |
| License | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 7mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 13, 2026 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
Tracexy
Tracexy is a comprehensive network inspection tool for macOS, allowing users to analyze network sessions, protocols, processes, and packet data. It's particularly useful for developers and system administrators seeking to troubleshoot network issues. The app's ability to trace failures back to specific applications makes it a valuable addition to network debugging workflows.
Tracexy inspects and analyzes network traffic, processes, and protocols to help identify and resolve network-related issues.
Pros
- + Comprehensive network inspection capabilities
- + Integration with macOS ecosystem for seamless use
- + Auto-update feature ensures the tool stays current
Cons
- - Early development stage may lead to bugs or incomplete features
- - Low adoption rate could limit community support and resources
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures