Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

TinyPNG4Mac vs ImageOptim

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

TinyPNG4Mac

7.5
Media & Design

TinyPNG client

ImageOptim

7.5
Media & Design

Tool to optimise images to a smaller size

Metric TinyPNG4Mac ImageOptim
Category Media & Design Media & Design
AI Score 7.5 7.5
30-day Installs 12 628
90-day Installs 20 1.9K
365-day Installs 189 7.7K
Version 2.2.1,20201 1.9.3
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated Yes No
GitHub Stars 4.0K 9.7K
GitHub Forks 290 458
Open Issues 15 195
License MIT GPL-2.0
Language Swift HTML
Last GitHub Commit 5mo ago 2y ago
First Seen Oct 20, 2019 Aug 9, 2023

Reviews

TinyPNG4Mac

TinyPNG4Mac is a native macOS client for TinyPNG, offering a seamless way to compress PNG and JPEG images without losing quality. Key features include drag-and-drop functionality, batch processing, and integration with macOS workflows. It benefits designers and anyone needing efficient image optimization.

Compresses PNG and JPEG images using the TinyPNG API, optimizing them for web use without quality loss.

Pros

  • + Native macOS integration provides a smooth user experience.
  • + Supports drag-and-drop and batch processing for efficient workflow.
  • + Developed in Swift, ensuring modern and maintainable code.
  • + Actively maintained with frequent updates and issue resolutions.

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature, requiring manual checks for updates.
  • - Low installation count suggests limited adoption.

ImageOptim

ImageOptim is a popular macOS app that optimizes images to reduce file size without compromising quality. It's widely used by web developers and designers to enhance website performance and is known for its effectiveness in cutting image file sizes significantly.

Optimizes images to smaller sizes without losing quality.

Pros

  • + Highly effective in reducing image file sizes without quality loss.
  • + Popular and widely recognized in the developer community.
  • + Open-source with a strong community support.
  • + Good integration with macOS ecosystem.

Cons

  • - Outdated user interface.
  • - Lacks lossy optimization options, which some users desire.