Textadept vs Emacs
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Textadept
8.0Text editor
Emacs
9.0GNU Emacs text editor
| Metric | Textadept | Emacs |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 3 | 1.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 16 | 5.5K |
| 365-day Installs | 104 | 26.9K |
| Version | 13.0 | 31.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 860 | 5.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 52 | 1.4K |
| Open Issues | 14 | 17 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Lua | Emacs Lisp |
| Last GitHub Commit | 6mo ago | 5mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 16, 2012 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Textadept
Textadept is a fast, minimalist text editor with Lua extensibility, ideal for programmers seeking a lightweight yet powerful tool. Its cross-platform support and customization options make it a favorite for developers who value speed and flexibility.
Textadept is a cross-platform text editor designed for programmers, offering extensibility through Lua scripting.
Pros
- + High performance and speed
- + Lua-based extensibility for customization
- + Minimalist design with a focus on functionality
- + Cross-platform availability
- + Active development and community support
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Occasional platform-specific bugs
Emacs
Emacs is a highly customizable and powerful text editor favored by developers and power users. Its extensibility through Emacs Lisp and vast package ecosystem make it a versatile tool for various tasks. It benefits those who need a flexible and feature-rich editor.
Emacs is a text editor with a built-in Lisp-based customization layer, allowing extensive configuration.
Pros
- + Highly customizable and extensible through Emacs Lisp
- + Large and active community with extensive package ecosystem
- + Cross-platform support with consistent functionality
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Resource-intensive, especially with many plugins