Status vs WhatsApp
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Status
6.0Decentralised wallet and messenger
Native desktop client for WhatsApp
| Metric | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Communication |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 16 | 5.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 72 | 16.9K |
| 365-day Installs | 247 | 56.4K |
| Version | 2.37.1,760417 | 2.26.17.19 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 352 | 2.2K |
| GitHub Forks | 94 | 495 |
| Open Issues | 911 | 170 |
| License | MPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | QML | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1y ago |
| First Seen | Mar 4, 2026 | Apr 11, 2015 |
Reviews
Status
Status is a decentralized wallet and messenger that combines secure communication with financial capabilities. It offers privacy-focused features for both messaging and cryptocurrency management, ideal for users prioritizing security and decentralization.
Status enables users to send and receive cryptocurrency, communicate securely, and explore decentralized applications.
Pros
- + Decentralized and privacy-focused for both communication and finance.
- + Cross-platform support enhancing accessibility.
- + Open-source with active development.
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates may require manual management.
- - High number of open issues suggests possible instability.
WhatsApp offers a native desktop experience, enabling users to communicate seamlessly on their computers. It provides messaging, voice, and video calls, benefiting those who prefer desktop use without needing a phone.
WhatsApp is the native desktop client allowing communication through the app on a computer.
Pros
- + Free to use
- + Seamless integration with mobile app
- + Support for voice and video calls
Cons
- - Privacy concerns
- - Risk of user bans