SSHFS vs ForkLift
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
SSHFS
8.0Network filesystem client to connect to SSH servers
ForkLift
8.0Finder replacement and FTP, SFTP, WebDAV and Amazon s3 client
| Metric | SSHFS | ForkLift |
|---|---|---|
| Category | System Tools | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 624 | 357 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.2K | 1.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 1.2K | 4.8K |
| Version | 3.7.5 | 4.7.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 7.4K | 189 |
| GitHub Forks | 536 | 204 |
| Open Issues | 51 | 60 |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | Shell |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 4mo ago |
| First Seen | May 14, 2026 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
SSHFS
SSHFS enables users to mount remote filesystems over SSH, making it ideal for developers and system administrators. It offers seamless integration with macOS and is maintained as an open-source project with active community support.
Mounts remote filesystems via SSH connections.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support
- + Open-source and community-driven
- + Seamless macOS integration
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Primarily command-line interface
ForkLift
ForkLift is a powerful Finder replacement and file transfer client that supports FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3. It offers a modern interface for file management and syncing with cloud storage, making it ideal for users who need robust file transfer capabilities.
ForkLift acts as a file manager and client for various file transfer protocols, including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3.
Pros
- + Modern Finder replacement with advanced features
- + Supports multiple file transfer protocols
- + Cloud storage integration capabilities
- + Auto-updates keep the software current
- + Active development and maintenance
Cons
- - May have a steep learning curve for new users
- - Occasional bugs reported in the issue tracker