SquidMan vs SFM
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
SquidMan
6.0Manage and install Squid proxy cache
SFM
7.5Standalone client for sing-box, the universal proxy platform
| Metric | SquidMan | SFM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 16 | 541 |
| 90-day Installs | 60 | 1.6K |
| 365-day Installs | 407 | 6.1K |
| Version | 4.2 | 1.13.11 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1 | 31.3K |
| GitHub Forks | - | 3.7K |
| Open Issues | - | 172 |
| License | — | NOASSERTION |
| Language | — | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 16, 2013 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
SquidMan
SquidMan simplifies managing and installing the Squid proxy cache, offering a user-friendly GUI for network administrators and developers. It streamlines proxy server setup, making it easier to configure caching and filtering rules.
SquidMan provides a graphical interface to manage and install the Squid proxy server, enabling users to configure caching and filtering settings.
Pros
- + Simplifies Squid proxy server setup and configuration
- + User-friendly graphical interface for managing proxy settings
- + Dedicated tool for Squid proxy management
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Low community engagement and inactive project
SFM
SFM is a standalone client for sing-box, offering a universal proxy solution. It supports various proxy protocols, making it versatile for users needing secure and flexible internet access. Ideal for those managing complex network configurations.
SFM provides a graphical interface for managing sing-box, enabling users to configure and monitor proxy connections.
Pros
- + Versatile proxy management capabilities
- + Active development and community support
- + Cross-platform compatibility
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Moderate user base compared to other tools