Splashtop Streamer vs RustDesk
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Splashtop Streamer
6.5Connect to and control computers from desktop and mobile devices
RustDesk
8.0Open source virtual/remote desktop application
| Metric | Splashtop Streamer | RustDesk |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Communication |
| AI Score | 6.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 28 | 2.7K |
| 90-day Installs | 81 | 8.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 490 | 21.2K |
| Version | 3.8.2.0 | 1.4.6 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 109.0K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 16.2K |
| Open Issues | — | 99 |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 30, 2013 | May 28, 2022 |
Reviews
Splashtop Streamer
Splashtop Streamer enables remote access and control of computers from any device, offering cross-platform compatibility and ease of use. Ideal for remote work, IT professionals, and anyone needing seamless device access.
Enables remote access and control of computers from desktops or mobile devices.
Pros
- + Cross-platform compatibility for versatile device access
- + User-friendly interface suitable for both casual and professional users
- + Auto-updates ensure the latest features and security patches
Cons
- - Basic interface may lack advanced customization options
- - Free version has limitations, requiring a paid plan for full functionality
RustDesk
RustDesk is an open-source remote desktop application designed as a self-hosted alternative to TeamViewer. It offers secure, cross-platform remote access and control, making it ideal for users seeking privacy and flexibility.
Enables remote access and control of other computers, providing a secure and efficient alternative to proprietary solutions.
Pros
- + Open-source and self-hostable, ensuring privacy and control
- + Written in Rust, offering performance and security advantages
- + Active and large community with high GitHub engagement
- + Regular updates and strong development activity
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Potential privacy concerns with Chinese root certificates