SoundflowerBed vs OBS
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
SoundflowerBed
5.0Taps into Soundflower channels and route them to an audio device
OBS
8.0Open-source software for live streaming and screen recording
| Metric | SoundflowerBed | OBS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 5.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 4 | 4.4K |
| 90-day Installs | 9 | 12.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 41 | 44.4K |
| Version | 2.0.0 | 32.1.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 454 | 70.8K |
| GitHub Forks | 29 | 9.1K |
| Open Issues | 1 | 1.1K |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | C++ | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 7y ago | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Jul 16, 2014 |
Reviews
SoundflowerBed
SoundflowerBed is a tool for routing audio from Soundflower channels to external devices, making it ideal for content creators and audio engineers. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing audio streams, though its development has been stagnant since 2019.
Routes audio from Soundflower channels to external audio devices.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use under the MIT license
- + Useful for routing audio streams in specific workflows
- + Provides a graphical interface for managing audio routes
Cons
- - Unmaintained and no auto-update feature
- - Niche tool with limited appeal beyond specific use cases
OBS
OBS is a versatile, open-source tool for live streaming and screen recording, offering extensive customization and plugin support. It's ideal for content creators, gamers, and developers seeking a free, flexible solution for video production.
Enables live streaming and screen recording with customizable settings and third-party plugins.
Pros
- + Open-source with active community support
- + Highly customizable with plugin ecosystem
- + Free and widely adopted across multiple platforms
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Occasional bugs due to its complexity