Sleipnir vs Helium
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Sleipnir
4.0Web browser
Helium
8.0Chromium-based web browser
| Metric | Sleipnir | Helium |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browsers | Browsers |
| AI Score | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2 | 1.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 8 | 4.0K |
| 365-day Installs | 27 | 8.4K |
| Version | 4.6.6 | 0.12.1.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 840 | 968 |
| GitHub Forks | 47 | 48 |
| Open Issues | 10 | 16 |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Swift | C++ |
| Last GitHub Commit | 10y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 12, 2014 | Sep 26, 2025 |
Reviews
Sleipnir
Sleipnir is a lightweight Swift-based web browser offering a modern experience with a focus on speed and customization. It supports features like tabs, bookmarks, and extensions, making it ideal for users seeking a streamlined browsing experience.
Sleipnir is a web browser built with Swift, providing a fast and customizable browsing experience.
Pros
- + Lightweight and fast
- + Developed in Swift
- + Customizable browser experience
Cons
- - No auto-updates
- - Sparse recent community activity
Helium
Helium is a Chromium-based, open-source web browser built for macOS, offering a modern and customizable browsing experience. It benefits users seeking an alternative to mainstream browsers with active development and community contributions.
Helium provides a web browsing experience similar to Chrome and Edge but with open-source transparency.
Pros
- + Open-source with GPL-3.0 license, promoting transparency and community contributions.
- + Built on Chromium, ensuring compatibility with web standards and extensions.
- + Active development and responsive community support.
Cons
- - GPL-3.0 license may be less preferred by some users compared to permissive licenses.
- - Lacks unique features beyond standard Chromium functionality.