Sleipnir vs Brave
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Sleipnir
4.0Web browser
Brave
8.0Web browser focusing on privacy
| Metric | Sleipnir | Brave |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Browsers | Browsers |
| AI Score | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2 | 7.6K |
| 90-day Installs | 8 | 24.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 27 | 86.7K |
| Version | 4.6.6 | 1.89.145.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 840 | 21.9K |
| GitHub Forks | 47 | 3.0K |
| Open Issues | 10 | 9.9K |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Swift | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 10y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 12, 2014 | Oct 21, 2018 |
Reviews
Sleipnir
Sleipnir is a lightweight Swift-based web browser offering a modern experience with a focus on speed and customization. It supports features like tabs, bookmarks, and extensions, making it ideal for users seeking a streamlined browsing experience.
Sleipnir is a web browser built with Swift, providing a fast and customizable browsing experience.
Pros
- + Lightweight and fast
- + Developed in Swift
- + Customizable browser experience
Cons
- - No auto-updates
- - Sparse recent community activity
Brave
Brave is a privacy-focused web browser that blocks ads and trackers by default, offering features like Brave Shields and a built-in ad blocker. It supports a variety of platforms and emphasizes user privacy, making it ideal for those concerned about online tracking.
Brave is a web browser designed to enhance privacy and security by blocking trackers and ads, while providing users with a customizable browsing experience.
Pros
- + Strong focus on privacy with features like ad blocking and tracker prevention.
- + Support for decentralized technologies like IPFS.
- + Customizable and user-friendly interface.
Cons
- - Some users may find the browser's security audits to be a concern, though they are actively being addressed.
- - Lack of support for vertical tabs, which some users have requested.