Skills Manager vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Skills Manager
8.0Manage, sync, and organise AI agent skills across coding tools
Cursor
7.5Write, edit, and chat about your code with AI
| Metric | Skills Manager | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 158 | 7.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 158 | 26.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 158 | 126.8K |
| Version | 1.36.0 | 3.18.9,2ba48ff3f7514cc4643c52ca9f7b3173d9b66137 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 4.0K | 32.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 340 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 182 | 1 |
| License | MIT | — |
| Language | Rust | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 8d ago | 7mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 24, 2026 | Mar 30, 2023 |
Reviews
Skills Manager
Skills Manager is a niche tool for developers managing AI agent skills across multiple coding platforms. It offers a centralized way to organize and sync skills for tools like Claude Code, Codex, and Copilot, making it ideal for developers using various AI tools.
Manages and synchronizes AI agent skills across over 50 coding tools.
Pros
- + Centralizes management of AI skills across multiple platforms
- + Active development with frequent updates
- + Strong community support and popularity
Cons
- - No recent installs indicate low adoption
- - High number of open issues may affect user experience
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that enables developers to write, edit, and collaborate on code with real-time AI suggestions and chat features. It stands out for its unique combination of AI-driven code assistance and team collaboration capabilities, making it a valuable tool for developers seeking enhanced productivity and feedback.
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that provides real-time code suggestions, editing, and collaboration features.
Pros
- + AI-driven code suggestions and real-time feedback enhance productivity
- + Collaboration features allow for team coding and brainstorming
- + Strong community and developer interest as evidenced by GitHub stats
Cons
- - Occasional bugs and reliability issues reported by users
- - Negative press mentions regarding security and user experience