Signal vs Jitsi
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Signal
8.0Instant messaging application focusing on security
Jitsi
8.0Open-source video calls and chat
| Metric | Signal | Jitsi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2.8K | 16 |
| 90-day Installs | 9.5K | 50 |
| 365-day Installs | 35.5K | 234 |
| Version | 8.8.0 | 2.10.5550 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 28.4K | 4.3K |
| GitHub Forks | 6.7K | 979 |
| Open Issues | 476 | 221 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Kotlin | Java |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 9mo ago |
| First Seen | Nov 1, 2017 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Signal
Signal is a privacy-focused instant messaging app with end-to-end encryption, designed for secure communication. It supports text, voice, and video calls, benefiting users who prioritize security and anonymity.
Signal provides secure, encrypted messaging and communication services for text, voice, and video calls.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures secure communication
- + User-friendly interface with strong privacy features
- + Regular updates and active development
Cons
- - Persistent issues with call functionality
- - Lack of desktop app features like read receipts
- - MacOS app is a web wrapper, not a native experience
Jitsi
Jitsi is an open-source video calling and chat application that supports multiple communication protocols, making it ideal for users who prioritize privacy and flexibility. It offers end-to-end encryption and is suitable for teams or individuals seeking secure communication solutions.
Jitsi enables video calls, chat, and file transfers using protocols like SIP, XMPP, and IRC.
Pros
- + Open-source with a permissive Apache-2.0 license
- + Supports multiple communication protocols
- + Auto-updates for the latest features and security
- + Active and engaged community
- + End-to-end encryption capabilities
Cons
- - Lower 30-day install count
- - Open issue regarding OMEMO support