ShadowsocksX vs SFM
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
ShadowsocksX
6.5Removed according to regulations
SFM
7.5Standalone client for sing-box, the universal proxy platform
| Metric | ShadowsocksX | SFM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Utilities |
| AI Score | 6.5 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 22 | 541 |
| 90-day Installs | 83 | 1.6K |
| 365-day Installs | 278 | 6.1K |
| Version | 2.6.3 | 1.13.11 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 8.2K | 31.3K |
| GitHub Forks | 3.4K | 3.7K |
| Open Issues | 178 | 172 |
| License | — | NOASSERTION |
| Language | Objective-C | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 4y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Mar 19, 2014 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
ShadowsocksX
ShadowsocksX is a macOS implementation of the Shadowsocks protocol, providing a SOCKS5 proxy server for bypassing internet restrictions. It offers open-source transparency and a mature codebase, benefiting users seeking privacy and circumvention tools.
Creates a SOCKS5 proxy server for bypassing internet restrictions.
Pros
- + Open-source with a transparent implementation.
- + Mature codebase with extensive community contributions.
- + Integrates well with Homebrew for easy installation.
Cons
- - No auto-update functionality.
- - Lack of official support and recent development activity.
SFM
SFM is a standalone client for sing-box, offering a universal proxy solution. It supports various proxy protocols, making it versatile for users needing secure and flexible internet access. Ideal for those managing complex network configurations.
SFM provides a graphical interface for managing sing-box, enabling users to configure and monitor proxy connections.
Pros
- + Versatile proxy management capabilities
- + Active development and community support
- + Cross-platform compatibility
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Moderate user base compared to other tools