Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

ServerBox vs Transmit

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

ServerBox

7.0
Utilities

App for monitoring server status with SSH terminal, SFTP, Container management

Transmit

8.0
Utilities

File transfer application

Metric ServerBox Transmit
Category Utilities Utilities
AI Score 7.0 8.0
30-day Installs 52 334
90-day Installs 52 1.1K
365-day Installs 52 4.2K
Version 1.0.1390 5.11.6
Auto-updates No Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 7.9K
GitHub Forks 488
Open Issues 11
License AGPL-3.0
Language Dart
Last GitHub Commit 10d ago
First Seen Apr 26, 2026 Aug 9, 2023

Reviews

ServerBox

ServerBox is a comprehensive GUI tool for monitoring and managing servers through SSH, SFTP, and container management. Built with Dart and Flutter, it offers a cross-platform experience with strong community support, making it ideal for system administrators seeking a unified interface.

ServerBox provides a graphical interface for server monitoring, SSH terminal access, SFTP file transfer, and container management.

Pros

  • + Offers a user-friendly graphical interface for server management tasks.
  • + Supports SSH, SFTP, and container management, providing versatile tools for system administrators.
  • + Cross-platform compatibility via Dart and Flutter, ensuring access across different operating systems.

Cons

  • - Lacks auto-update functionality, which may require manual checks for updates.
  • - Limited presence in social media and community forums, potentially affecting user support.

Transmit

Transmit is a feature-rich file transfer application designed for efficient uploading, downloading, and management of files across various servers and cloud storage services. Its user-friendly interface, support for multiple protocols, and integration with cloud services make it a valuable tool for professionals and developers who need reliable file transfer capabilities.

Transmit enables users to transfer files using protocols like FTP, SFTP, and WebDAV, as well as manage cloud storage services.

Pros

  • + User-friendly interface with a polished design.
  • + Support for multiple file transfer protocols and cloud integration.
  • + Regular updates and active development.

Cons

  • - Higher price point compared to competitors.
  • - May lack some advanced features found in alternatives like Cyberduck.