Screens vs Deskreen
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Screens
8.0Remote access software focusing on usability
Deskreen
8.0Turns any device with a web browser into a secondary screen
| Metric | Screens | Deskreen |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 18 | 93 |
| 90-day Installs | 63 | 302 |
| 365-day Installs | 233 | 963 |
| Version | 4.12.16,1696599453 | 3.2.15 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 20.3K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 1.1K |
| Open Issues | — | 20 |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | TypeScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 26, 2015 | Feb 4, 2021 |
Reviews
Screens
Screens is a remote access app designed for ease of use, allowing users to control and access other computers remotely. It offers features like remote desktop, file transfer, and clipboard synchronization, making it ideal for professionals needing seamless remote access.
Screens enables remote access to other computers, providing tools for remote control, file transfer, and clipboard synchronization.
Pros
- + User-friendly interface and ease of use.
- + Support for multiple platforms and devices.
- + Reliable and consistent performance.
Cons
- - Subscription-based pricing may be a barrier for some users.
- - Limited advanced customization options.
Deskreen
Deskreen allows users to turn any device with a web browser into a secondary screen, offering a unique solution for extending desktop displays. Its open-source nature and cross-platform support make it appealing to developers and productivity-focused users.
Deskreen enables any web browser-enabled device to function as an additional screen for your computer.
Pros
- + Open-source with a strong community backing
- + Cross-platform support and flexibility
- + High community interest and active development
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality
- - Some users report technical limitations