← Browse all apps Media & Design Media & Design
Screenflick vs Loom
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Screenflick
5.0Screen recorder with audio
Loom
7.0Screen and video recording software
| Metric | Screenflick | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media & Design | Media & Design |
| AI Score | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 11 | 484 |
| 90-day Installs | 42 | 1.4K |
| 365-day Installs | 237 | 4.9K |
| Version | 3.3.2 | 0.346.4 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1 | 2.6K |
| GitHub Forks | - | 131 |
| Open Issues | - | 108 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | Batchfile | Rust |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1y ago | 2mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 16, 2013 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Screenflick
Screenflick is a screen recorder with audio capabilities, suitable for capturing tutorials or presentations. It offers essential features for screen recording but lacks active community support or frequent updates.
Screenflick records screen activity with audio.
Pros
- + Dedicated screen recording tool with audio support
- + Available via Homebrew cask for easy installation
- + Suitable for creating tutorials or presentations
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Limited community and development activity
Loom
Loom is an open-source screen and video recording software built with Rust, offering features like screen recording, video editing, and cloud integration. It's ideal for developers and content creators seeking a reliable, performance-focused tool.
Loom is screen and video recording software.
Pros
- + Open-source and built with Rust for performance and reliability.
- + Active development with regular updates.
- + Cloud service integration enhances workflow.
Cons
- - Niche appeal, primarily targeting developers.
- - May lack user-friendliness for non-technical users.