Rockxy vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Rockxy
8.0HTTP proxy
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | Rockxy | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 24 | 4.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 24 | 12.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 24 | 47.8K |
| Version | 0.15.1,24 | 4.6.5 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 356 | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | 13 | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | 25 | 2 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Swift | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 11d ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Apr 26, 2026 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
Rockxy
Rockxy is a powerful HTTP debugging proxy for macOS that enables developers to intercept HTTPS traffic, inspect APIs, mock responses, and debug WebSocket and GraphQL connections. Its open-source nature and community-driven development make it a valuable tool for developers seeking a robust debugging solution.
Rockxy acts as a native macOS HTTP debugging proxy, allowing users to intercept and analyze network traffic.
Pros
- + Open-source and community-driven, fostering collaboration and transparency.
- + Comprehensive debugging capabilities for HTTP, HTTPS, WebSocket, and GraphQL.
- + Native macOS application optimized for performance and usability.
Cons
- - Limited community discussion or third-party mentions.
- - May require a learning curve for less experienced users.
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures