Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Retrace vs Screen Studio

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Retrace

8.0
Productivity

Local-first screen recording and search application

Screen Studio

6.0
Media & Design

Screen recorder and editor

Metric Retrace Screen Studio
Category Productivity Media & Design
AI Score 8.0 6.0
30-day Installs 10 135
90-day Installs 53 441
365-day Installs 94 1.5K
Version 0.8.7 3.6.0-4214
Auto-updates Yes Yes
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars 105 6
GitHub Forks 7 -
Open Issues 1 -
License MIT GPL-3.0
Language Swift Java
Last GitHub Commit 1mo ago 9y ago
First Seen Feb 1, 2026 Jul 8, 2023

Reviews

Retrace

Retrace is a local-first screen recording and search application that allows users to easily record, search, and review their screen activities. It is designed for content creators, educators, and anyone who needs to review their work, offering a unique combination of local-first functionality and search capabilities.

Retrace enables users to record and search their screen activities locally.

Pros

  • + Local-first functionality ensures data privacy and security.
  • + Search capabilities make it easy to find and review specific screen activities.
  • + Open-source nature allows for customization and community contributions.
  • + User-friendly interface facilitates easy recording and search.

Cons

  • - Early stage with limited features may restrict its appeal to niche users.
  • - Potential performance issues, though the reported issue has been resolved.

Screen Studio

Screen Studio is a screen recorder and editor that allows users to capture desktop activity, overlay text or webcam footage, and stream to platforms like Twitch. It's ideal for content creators looking for a straightforward tool to produce high-quality screen recordings.

Records desktop activity, adds overlays, and streams to platforms.

Pros

  • + Full HD recording capability
  • + Text and webcam overlay features
  • + Streaming support to major platforms
  • + Auto-update functionality
  • + Free and open-source under GPL-3.0

Cons

  • - Inactive development with no recent updates
  • - Appeals to a niche audience
  • - Java-based, potentially affecting performance