Glaze vs Cursor
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Glaze
6.0Create desktop apps by chatting with AI
Cursor
7.5Write, edit, and chat about your code with AI
| Metric | Glaze | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 35 | 6.0K |
| 90-day Installs | 159 | 18.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 262 | 117.9K |
| Version | 0.14.3,28ffe89da7 | 3.25.9,5d4df965746c5d09740842fc0f1331ba1c15783d |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 415 | 32.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 11 | 2.2K |
| Open Issues | 32 | 1 |
| License | MIT | — |
| Language | TypeScript | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3y ago | 8mo ago |
| First Seen | Jul 7, 2026 | Mar 30, 2023 |
Reviews
Glaze
Glaze is a unique tool that leverages AI to aid in the creation of desktop applications, offering real-time feedback and collaboration. It is particularly beneficial for developers looking to streamline their app development process with AI-driven assistance.
Glaze helps create desktop applications by integrating AI-driven collaboration and feedback.
Pros
- + Innovative use of AI for app development
- + Provides real-time feedback and collaboration features
- + MIT license promotes open-source use
Cons
- - Lack of recent updates may indicate slower development
- - Open issues suggest potential documentation and functionality improvements
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that enables developers to write, edit, and collaborate on code with real-time AI suggestions and chat features. It stands out for its unique combination of AI-driven code assistance and team collaboration capabilities, making it a valuable tool for developers seeking enhanced productivity and feedback.
Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that provides real-time code suggestions, editing, and collaboration features.
Pros
- + AI-driven code suggestions and real-time feedback enhance productivity
- + Collaboration features allow for team coding and brainstorming
- + Strong community and developer interest as evidenced by GitHub stats
Cons
- - Occasional bugs and reliability issues reported by users
- - Negative press mentions regarding security and user experience