Pulse vs Mac Performance Monitor
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Pulse
5.5System activity monitor for CPU, memory, GPU, disk and network
Mac Performance Monitor
8.0Menu bar performance monitor with recorded history and analytics
| Metric | Pulse | Mac Performance Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 5.5 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 100 | 236 |
| 90-day Installs | 100 | 321 |
| 365-day Installs | 100 | 321 |
| Version | 0.1.28 | 2.4.0.289 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1 | 380 |
| GitHub Forks | - | 23 |
| Open Issues | 6 | 2 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | — | Swift |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5d ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 15, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 |
Reviews
Pulse
Pulse is a cross-platform system activity monitor that tracks CPU, memory, GPU, disk, and network usage. It offers real-time insights into system performance, making it ideal for users who need to monitor resource usage across Mac, Windows, and Linux.
Monitors system resources including CPU, memory, GPU, disk, and network usage in real-time.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support for Mac, Windows, and Linux
- + Free and open-source
- + Real-time monitoring of system resources
Cons
- - Early-stage project with limited community traction
- - UI issues on macOS 26
Mac Performance Monitor
Mac Performance Monitor offers real-time performance metrics and historical data from the menu bar, making it ideal for developers and power users needing to monitor system health. It provides detailed insights into CPU, memory, GPU, network, and battery usage without telemetry.
Monitors and logs system performance metrics from the menu bar, offering historical data and analytics.
Pros
- + Provides real-time performance metrics and historical data
- + Open-source with no telemetry, ensuring privacy
- + Integrates seamlessly with macOS system tools
Cons
- - Limited customization options for monitoring parameters
- - Sparse community support and discussion