Psi vs Signal
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Psi
6.0Instant messaging application designed for the XMPP network
Signal
8.0Instant messaging application focusing on security
| Metric | Psi | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 4 | 2.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 22 | 9.4K |
| 365-day Installs | 125 | 35.4K |
| Version | 1.4 | 8.8.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 3.1K | 28.4K |
| GitHub Forks | 122 | 6.7K |
| Open Issues | 15 | 476 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Kotlin |
| Last GitHub Commit | 5y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Jun 11, 2014 | Nov 1, 2017 |
Reviews
Psi
Psi is a decentralized instant messaging app for the XMPP network, offering privacy-focused communication. It supports multiple platforms and integrates with various XMPP services, ideal for users valuing privacy and control over their messaging experience.
Psi is an XMPP client enabling instant messaging across a decentralized network.
Pros
- + Supports decentralized communication, enhancing privacy.
- + Cross-platform compatibility for versatile use.
- + Open-source with Apache-2.0 license, promoting transparency.
Cons
- - No updates since 2021, raising concerns about maintenance.
- - Lack of recent community engagement may indicate stagnation.
Signal
Signal is a privacy-focused instant messaging app with end-to-end encryption, designed for secure communication. It supports text, voice, and video calls, benefiting users who prioritize security and anonymity.
Signal provides secure, encrypted messaging and communication services for text, voice, and video calls.
Pros
- + End-to-end encryption ensures secure communication
- + User-friendly interface with strong privacy features
- + Regular updates and active development
Cons
- - Persistent issues with call functionality
- - Lack of desktop app features like read receipts
- - MacOS app is a web wrapper, not a native experience