Proxyman vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Proxyman
7.0HTTP debugging proxy
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | Proxyman | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 1.5K | 4.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 4.2K | 12.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 11.4K | 47.8K |
| Version | 6.9.0,60900 | 4.6.5 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 6.7K | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | 237 | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | 1.8K | 2 |
| License | — | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | — | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2018 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
Proxyman
Proxyman is a powerful HTTP debugging proxy that simplifies capturing and manipulating HTTP/HTTPS traffic across macOS, iOS, and Android. Its user-friendly interface and cross-platform support make it an essential tool for developers and anyone troubleshooting network issues.
Proxyman captures and manipulates HTTP/HTTPS traffic, allowing users to inspect, modify, and debug network requests.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support for macOS, iOS, and Android
- + User-friendly interface for inspecting and modifying network traffic
- + Auto-updates keep the tool current with the latest features and fixes
Cons
- - A large number of open GitHub issues may indicate ongoing development and potential instability
- - Some users have reported difficulties installing certificates on physical iOS devices
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures