ProxyBridge vs SFM
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
ProxyBridge
8.0Proxy client with per-application traffic routing rules
SFM
7.5Standalone client for sing-box, the universal proxy platform
| Metric | ProxyBridge | SFM |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Utilities |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.5 |
| 30-day Installs | 136 | 817 |
| 90-day Installs | 261 | 2.1K |
| 365-day Installs | 261 | 6.6K |
| Version | 4.0.0 | 1.14.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 5.3K | 31.3K |
| GitHub Forks | 320 | 3.7K |
| Open Issues | 32 | 172 |
| License | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Language | C | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 5mo ago |
| First Seen | Jul 9, 2026 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
ProxyBridge
ProxyBridge is a versatile proxy client enabling per-application traffic routing across multiple platforms. It offers cross-platform support and active development, making it a robust tool for managing network traffic.
ProxyBridge redirects any application's TCP/UDP traffic through HTTP or SOCKS5 proxies.
Pros
- + Cross-platform support for Windows, macOS, and Linux
- + Per-application traffic routing capabilities
- + Active development and good GitHub traction
Cons
- - Open issue regarding connection drops after screen locking
- - Low recent installs indicating limited adoption
SFM
SFM is a standalone client for sing-box, offering a universal proxy solution. It supports various proxy protocols, making it versatile for users needing secure and flexible internet access. Ideal for those managing complex network configurations.
SFM provides a graphical interface for managing sing-box, enabling users to configure and monitor proxy connections.
Pros
- + Versatile proxy management capabilities
- + Active development and community support
- + Cross-platform compatibility
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Moderate user base compared to other tools