PingPlotter vs Wireshark
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
PingPlotter
6.0Network monitoring tool
Wireshark
9.0Network protocol analyzer
| Metric | PingPlotter | Wireshark |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 36 | 4.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 82 | 12.8K |
| 365-day Installs | 338 | 47.8K |
| Version | 5.25.20 | 4.6.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 3 | 9.1K |
| GitHub Forks | - | 2.1K |
| Open Issues | - | 2 |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | C# | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 4y ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Oct 21, 2016 | Aug 14, 2013 |
Reviews
PingPlotter
PingPlotter is a network monitoring tool that helps visualize network performance metrics such as round-trip times and packet loss. It is particularly useful for network administrators and IT professionals who need to diagnose and troubleshoot connection issues. The app provides real-time monitoring and detailed analysis features.
Visualizes network performance metrics in real-time, including round-trip times and packet loss.
Pros
- + Provides detailed network performance visualization
- + Real-time monitoring for quick issue identification
- + Analyzes packet loss and connection stability
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Limited community engagement and contributions
Wireshark
Wireshark is a powerful network protocol analyzer used for debugging and analyzing network traffic. It supports a wide range of protocols and offers both graphical and command-line interfaces, making it a versatile tool for developers and network administrators.
Wireshark captures and analyzes network traffic in real-time, providing detailed insights into data packets and network behavior.
Pros
- + Open-source and free to use
- + Extensive protocol support and deep packet inspection
- + Active development and community support
- + User-friendly graphical interface
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Real-time network monitoring
- + Scripting and automation capabilities
Cons
- - Steep learning curve for new users
- - Can be resource-intensive for large captures