Perimeter 81 vs Tailscale
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Perimeter 81
6.5Zero trust network as a service client
Tailscale
9.0Mesh VPN based on WireGuard
| Metric | Perimeter 81 | Tailscale |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 6.5 | 9.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 24 | 15.8K |
| 90-day Installs | 46 | 49.9K |
| 365-day Installs | 270 | 84.1K |
| Version | 12.7.4.9577 | 1.96.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 29.3K |
| GitHub Forks | — | 2.3K |
| Open Issues | — | 4.1K |
| License | — | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | — | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Perimeter 81
Perimeter 81 is a Zero Trust Network as a Service client that provides secure access to corporate resources. It offers centralized network management, cloud security, and remote employee productivity tools, benefiting businesses prioritizing cybersecurity.
Enables secure, Zero Trust network access for remote and corporate users, ensuring data protection and compliance.
Pros
- + Provides a Zero Trust security model for enhanced data protection
- + Centralized management for network access and security policies
- + Improves cloud security and employee productivity
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates may require manual maintenance
- - Limited installs suggest it's not widely adopted yet
Tailscale
Tailscale is a mesh VPN built on WireGuard, offering secure and easy-to-use networking for developers and remote teams. It provides features like 2FA and seamless device-to-device communication, making it ideal for those needing secure network setups.
Creates a secure, encrypted network allowing devices to communicate as if on the same local network.
Pros
- + Ease of use and setup for secure networking
- + Integration with WireGuard and support for 2FA
- + Strong community and developer support
Cons
- - Learning curve for networking concepts
- - Occasional compatibility issues with specific applications like Safari