Skip to content
cask.news
← Browse all apps

Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS vs Remote Viewer

Side-by-side comparison for macOS

Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS

8.0
System Tools

Client for VM agents and remote workstation cards

Remote Viewer

5.0
Utilities

Connect to virtual machines using SPICE

Metric Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS Remote Viewer
Category System Tools Utilities
AI Score 8.0 5.0
30-day Installs 4 218
90-day Installs 8 670
365-day Installs 46 3.7K
Version 26.05.5 0.5.7-1
Auto-updates No No
Deprecated No No
GitHub Stars — 29
GitHub Forks — 2
Open Issues — 4
License — —
Language — Vim script
Last GitHub Commit — 7y ago
First Seen Aug 20, 2020 Oct 16, 2015

Reviews

Teradici PCoIP Software Client for macOS

The Teradici PCoIP Software Client enables high-performance remote access to virtual machines and remote workstations, making it ideal for professionals who need seamless connectivity to enterprise resources. It supports advanced remote computing scenarios, ensuring a smooth experience for users in fields requiring intensive graphical or computational tasks.

Connects to remote VMs and workstations for high-performance remote computing.

Pros

  • + High-performance remote access capabilities.
  • + Essential for professionals needing to connect to enterprise VMs or remote workstations.
  • + Supports advanced graphical and computational tasks.

Cons

  • - No auto-update feature, requiring manual updates.
  • - Primarily designed for enterprise use, limiting its appeal to individual users.

Remote Viewer

Remote Viewer is a niche macOS application designed for connecting to virtual machines using the SPICE protocol. It provides a straightforward tool for managing virtualized environments, particularly beneficial for developers and IT professionals working with VMs.

Enables connection to virtual machines using the SPICE protocol for remote management.

Pros

  • + Free and open-source tool for VM management.
  • + Supports the SPICE protocol for remote access.
  • + Lightweight and potentially useful for niche users.

Cons

  • - No auto-updates and inactive development since 2019.
  • - Unknown license creates legal uncertainties.
  • - Sparse community engagement and low GitHub activity.