Paseo vs supacode
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Paseo
7.0Self-hosted daemon for AI coding agents
supacode
7.0Native terminal coding agents command center
| Metric | Paseo | supacode |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 538 | 587 |
| 90-day Installs | 621 | 1.0K |
| 365-day Installs | 621 | 1.0K |
| Version | 0.1.69 | 0.8.5 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 196 | 461 |
| GitHub Forks | 16 | 36 |
| Open Issues | 16 | 13 |
| License | NOASSERTION | NOASSERTION |
| Language | TypeScript | Swift |
| Last GitHub Commit | 1mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Mar 7, 2026 | Feb 9, 2026 |
Reviews
Paseo
Paseo is a self-hosted daemon designed to manage AI coding agents, allowing users to control them remotely from various devices. It offers cross-platform management capabilities, making it ideal for developers seeking to oversee AI tools independently.
Paseo serves as a self-hosted daemon that enables remote management of AI coding agents across different devices.
Pros
- + Self-hosted, providing control over data and infrastructure.
- + Enables remote management across multiple platforms.
- + Active development with recent updates.
Cons
- - Lack of auto-updates may lead to maintenance issues.
- - Low adoption with only 31 installs in the last 30 days.
supacode
Supacode is a native terminal command center designed for managing coding agents, offering real-time monitoring and control. It benefits developers who work with multiple coding tools, providing a centralized platform for efficient workflow management.
Supacode acts as a command center for managing terminal coding agents, enabling real-time monitoring and control.
Pros
- + Centralized command center for coding agents
- + Real-time monitoring and control capabilities
- + Integration with terminal workflows
Cons
- - Some historical issues with project loading
- - Limited community support and discussion