Paperpile vs EndNote
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Paperpile
5.0Citation plugin for Microsoft Word
EndNote
7.0Reference manager
| Metric | Paperpile | EndNote |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Education | Education |
| AI Score | 5.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 8 | 34 |
| 90-day Installs | 28 | 88 |
| 365-day Installs | 66 | 342 |
| Version | 0.10.1 | 22.3.0.22265,2025 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 20 | — |
| GitHub Forks | 5 | — |
| Open Issues | - | — |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Language | Perl | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 15y ago | — |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Oct 1, 2014 |
Reviews
Paperpile
Paperpile is a citation plugin for Microsoft Word that helps researchers manage references. It integrates seamlessly with Word, making it easier to cite sources and format papers. Ideal for researchers and academics who need efficient citation management.
It integrates with Microsoft Word to manage and format citations within documents.
Pros
- + Integrates well with Microsoft Word for citation management
- + Free and open-source under AGPL-3.0
- + Has a web interface for reference management
Cons
- - No updates since 2011, potential compatibility issues
- - Low community activity and support
EndNote
EndNote is a powerful reference management tool designed for researchers and academics. It offers robust citation management, PDF annotation, and seamless integration with academic databases. Its maturity and strong feature set make it a go-to choice for serious research work.
EndNote helps users organize and cite research sources, manage PDFs, and integrate with academic databases.
Pros
- + Comprehensive citation management features
- + Advanced PDF annotation and organization tools
- + Strong integration with academic databases and libraries
- + Mature and reliable software
- + Popular among researchers and academics
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Somewhat niche appeal
- - Limited recent community discussion