PacketProxy vs Stash
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
PacketProxy
6.5Local proxy written in Java
Stash
7.0Network tool based on Clash
| Metric | PacketProxy | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | System Tools | Utilities |
| AI Score | 6.5 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 2 | 77 |
| 90-day Installs | 12 | 308 |
| 365-day Installs | 38 | 940 |
| Version | 2.3.0 | 4.2.0,482 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 469 | 12.0K |
| GitHub Forks | 41 | 1.0K |
| Open Issues | 28 | 800 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 3mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Feb 27, 2026 |
Reviews
PacketProxy
PacketProxy is a local proxy tool written in Java, offering features like packet inspection and manipulation. It's particularly useful for developers and network administrators who need to debug or analyze network traffic. Despite its niche use case, it's actively maintained and supports cross-platform functionality.
Acts as a local proxy server for inspecting and manipulating network traffic.
Pros
- + Actively maintained with frequent updates
- + Cross-platform compatibility due to Java
- + Useful for network debugging and packet manipulation
Cons
- - Unsigned macOS installer may cause issues
- - No auto-update feature
Stash
Stash is a network tool based on Clash, offering proxy and network management features. It uniquely serves as an organizer for specific content, benefiting users seeking both network tools and content organization.
Stash is a network tool based on Clash, providing proxy capabilities and content organization features.
Pros
- + Open-source with AGPL-3.0 license, allowing modifications and distribution.
- + Active development evidenced by recent commits.
- + Niche functionality for content organization, appealing to specific users.
Cons
- - High number of open issues may indicate potential bugs or unaddressed feature requests.
- - Niche focus limits broader appeal.