NoMachine vs Chrome Remote Desktop
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
NoMachine
7.0Remote desktop software
Chrome Remote Desktop
7.0Remotely access another computer through the Google Chrome browser
| Metric | NoMachine | Chrome Remote Desktop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Communication | Communication |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 7 | 244 |
| 90-day Installs | 440 | 606 |
| 365-day Installs | 3.5K | 2.2K |
| Version | 9.8.2_1 | 155.0.8059.19 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 16 |
| GitHub Forks | — | 10 |
| Open Issues | — | 1 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | — | JavaScript |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 3y ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Apr 18, 2014 |
Reviews
NoMachine
NoMachine offers a lightweight remote desktop solution ideal for accessing Linux and other operating systems. It excels in performance and ease of use, making it suitable for both personal and team collaboration needs.
Enables remote access to desktops and applications across different operating systems.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient remote desktop experience
- + Strong support for Linux and cross-platform compatibility
- + High performance with low bandwidth usage
- + Free tier available with sufficient features for many users
- + Integration with cloud and virtualization services
Cons
- - Interface may be less intuitive for some users
- - Free version has limitations in features
Chrome Remote Desktop
Chrome Remote Desktop allows users to remotely access and control another computer directly through the Google Chrome browser, eliminating the need for third-party software. Built using Electron.js, it offers a free and cross-platform solution for remote access, leveraging Google's infrastructure for secure connections.
Enables remote access and control of another computer using the Google Chrome browser.
Pros
- + Free and open-source under MIT license.
- + Cross-platform compatibility.
- + Integration with Google accounts for secure access.
- + No third-party software required for remote access.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-update functionality.
- - One open GitHub issue indicating potential bugs.
- - Resource-intensive due to Electron.js framework.