Tenable Nessus vs Dylib Hijack Scanner
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Tenable Nessus
8.0Vulnerability scanner
Dylib Hijack Scanner
8.0Scans for dylib hijacking
| Metric | Tenable Nessus | Dylib Hijack Scanner |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Security & Privacy | Security & Privacy |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 34 | 19 |
| 90-day Installs | 97 | 62 |
| 365-day Installs | 493 | 292 |
| Version | 10.12.0 | 1.6.0 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | 115 |
| GitHub Forks | — | 15 |
| Open Issues | — | 1 |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | Objective-C |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | 6mo ago |
| First Seen | May 27, 2024 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Tenable Nessus
Tenable Nessus is a widely-used vulnerability scanner that helps identify and manage security risks across networks and systems. It offers comprehensive scanning capabilities, integrates with other security tools, and is trusted by organizations for robust security management.
Tenable Nessus scans networks and systems to detect vulnerabilities and security risks.
Pros
- + Comprehensive vulnerability scanning capabilities
- + Integration with other security tools and platforms
- + Established and trusted within the security community
Cons
- - Limited recent community discussion or updates
- - Does not support auto-updates
Dylib Hijack Scanner
Dylib Hijack Scanner (dhs) is a security tool that identifies applications susceptible to or already affected by dylib hijacking, a critical vulnerability in macOS. It is particularly useful for security professionals and developers looking to enhance system security by detecting and mitigating such risks.
Scans applications for vulnerabilities related to dylib hijacking.
Pros
- + Unique focus on detecting dylib hijacking vulnerabilities.
- + Open-source with a GPL-3.0 license, promoting transparency and community involvement.
- + Actively maintained with recent updates.
Cons
- - Lacks auto-updates, requiring manual checks for updates.
- - Limited adoption and installs, suggesting it may not be widely recognized.