Multi vs Fluid
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Multi
7.0Create apps from groups of websites
Fluid
6.0Tool to turn a website into a desktop app
| Metric | Multi | Fluid |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Productivity |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 6.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 27 | 19 |
| 90-day Installs | 81 | 61 |
| 365-day Installs | 255 | 330 |
| Version | 3.0.2 | 2.1.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1.4K | — |
| GitHub Forks | 42 | — |
| Open Issues | 31 | — |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Language | Swift | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | — |
| First Seen | Sep 21, 2020 | Oct 14, 2012 |
Reviews
Multi
Multi allows users to create custom macOS apps from collections of websites, offering a unique way to bundle web-based tools into a single application. It's ideal for developers and power users who want to streamline their workflow with tailored web apps.
Creates custom macOS applications from groups of websites.
Pros
- + Creates custom, lightweight macOS apps from websites.
- + Open-source with a strong community and active development.
- + Written in Swift, providing modern and efficient performance.
Cons
- - No auto-update feature.
- - Limited recent community discussion despite active development.
Fluid
Fluid allows users to turn any website into a desktop application, offering a seamless experience for frequent website visitors. It is particularly beneficial for those who want to access web apps like Gmail or Twitter without relying on a browser, providing a lightweight and integrated macOS experience.
Fluid converts websites into desktop applications, allowing them to be used like native apps.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient for accessing web apps
- + Good macOS integration with features like app switching
- + Customizable URLs and keyboard shortcuts
Cons
- - No auto-update feature requiring manual checks
- - Limited customization options and features