Mountain vs Mountain Duck
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Mountain
6.0Display notifications when mounting/unmounting volumes
Mountain Duck
7.0Mounts servers and cloud storages as a disk on the desktop
| Metric | Mountain | Mountain Duck |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Utilities | Cloud & Storage |
| AI Score | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 3 | 136 |
| 90-day Installs | 15 | 407 |
| 365-day Installs | 92 | 2.2K |
| Version | 1.6.6 | 5.3.2,29785 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | Yes | No |
| GitHub Stars | 386 | 1 |
| GitHub Forks | 20 | - |
| Open Issues | 2 | - |
| License | MIT | — |
| Language | Lua | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | 9mo ago | 8mo ago |
| First Seen | May 11, 2014 | Aug 9, 2023 |
Reviews
Mountain
Mountain is a lightweight macOS utility that notifies users when volumes are mounted or unmounted, making it ideal for those frequently managing external or network drives. It offers a simple yet effective solution for monitoring volume changes without requiring additional setup.
Monitors and notifies users of volume mounting and unmounting events on their system.
Pros
- + Lightweight and efficient for monitoring volume changes.
- + Open-source with an MIT license, encouraging transparency and community contributions.
- + Integrates well with macOS, providing a seamless user experience.
Cons
- - Lack of auto-update functionality may require manual checks for updates.
- - Limited recent installs and community discussion, indicating niche adoption.
Mountain Duck
Mountain Duck enables users to mount servers and cloud storage as a disk on their desktop, offering seamless access to cloud resources. It supports multiple cloud services and is ideal for users needing to manage cloud storage like local drives.
Mounts servers and cloud storages as a disk on the desktop, allowing users to access cloud resources as if they were local drives.
Pros
- + Integrates with various cloud services for versatile storage management.
- + Cross-platform support for macOS and Windows.
- + User-friendly interface for easy access to cloud resources.
Cons
- - Subscription-based pricing model may deter some users.
- - Limited GitHub activity raises concerns about community support.