Mountain Duck vs OneDrive
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Mountain Duck
7.0Mounts servers and cloud storages as a disk on the desktop
OneDrive
8.0Cloud storage client
| Metric | Mountain Duck | OneDrive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud & Storage | Cloud & Storage |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 178 | 1.1K |
| 90-day Installs | 567 | 3.0K |
| 365-day Installs | 2.2K | 13.2K |
| Version | 5.2.1,28671 | 26.062.0402.0002 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1 | 12.2K |
| GitHub Forks | - | 910 |
| Open Issues | - | 11 |
| License | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | — | D |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 7, 2023 |
Reviews
Mountain Duck
Mountain Duck enables users to mount servers and cloud storage as a disk on their desktop, offering seamless access to cloud resources. It supports multiple cloud services and is ideal for users needing to manage cloud storage like local drives.
Mounts servers and cloud storages as a disk on the desktop, allowing users to access cloud resources as if they were local drives.
Pros
- + Integrates with various cloud services for versatile storage management.
- + Cross-platform support for macOS and Windows.
- + User-friendly interface for easy access to cloud resources.
Cons
- - Subscription-based pricing model may deter some users.
- - Limited GitHub activity raises concerns about community support.
OneDrive
OneDrive is Microsoft's cloud storage client that seamlessly integrates with macOS, offering reliable file synchronization and storage solutions. It benefits users seeking a cross-platform, secure, and feature-rich cloud storage option.
OneDrive synchronizes files and folders across devices, providing access to cloud storage.
Pros
- + Cross-platform compatibility
- + Seamless file synchronization
- + Robust security features
Cons
- - Occasional high CPU usage
- - Performance issues on Linux