Mountain Duck vs Google Drive
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Mountain Duck
7.0Mounts servers and cloud storages as a disk on the desktop
Google Drive
7.0Client for the Google Drive storage service
| Metric | Mountain Duck | Google Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud & Storage | Cloud & Storage |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 178 | 3.5K |
| 90-day Installs | 567 | 12.3K |
| 365-day Installs | 2.2K | 37.0K |
| Version | 5.2.1,28671 | 124.0.3 |
| Auto-updates | Yes | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 1 | 5.9K |
| GitHub Forks | - | 367 |
| Open Issues | - | 278 |
| License | — | MIT |
| Language | — | OCaml |
| Last GitHub Commit | 3mo ago | 1mo ago |
| First Seen | Aug 9, 2023 | May 14, 2013 |
Reviews
Mountain Duck
Mountain Duck enables users to mount servers and cloud storage as a disk on their desktop, offering seamless access to cloud resources. It supports multiple cloud services and is ideal for users needing to manage cloud storage like local drives.
Mounts servers and cloud storages as a disk on the desktop, allowing users to access cloud resources as if they were local drives.
Pros
- + Integrates with various cloud services for versatile storage management.
- + Cross-platform support for macOS and Windows.
- + User-friendly interface for easy access to cloud resources.
Cons
- - Subscription-based pricing model may deter some users.
- - Limited GitHub activity raises concerns about community support.
Google Drive
Google Drive offers a reliable cloud storage solution for syncing files across devices and accessing them online. It integrates seamlessly with other Google services, making it ideal for users who rely on the Google ecosystem.
Enables syncing and management of files in the cloud via the Google Drive service.
Pros
- + Seamless integration with Google services
- + Cross-device file syncing
- + Free storage option
Cons
- - Risk of files being auto-deleted without warning
- - Content restrictions impacting usability