Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer vs Proton Drive
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer
7.0Explorer for Azure Storage
Proton Drive
7.0Client for Proton Drive
| Metric | Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer | Proton Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud & Storage | Cloud & Storage |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 481 | 486 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.3K | 1.5K |
| 365-day Installs | 4.8K | 5.2K |
| Version | 1.43.0 | 2.11.4 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 433 | 9 |
| GitHub Forks | 91 | - |
| Open Issues | 581 | - |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | MIT |
| Language | — | Go |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 2y ago |
| First Seen | May 24, 2016 | Nov 23, 2023 |
Reviews
Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer
Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer is a powerful tool for managing Azure Storage resources, offering comprehensive features for uploading, downloading, and controlling access to data. It benefits developers and cloud administrators by providing an intuitive interface for handling various storage types, including blobs, files, queues, tables, and VM disks.
Manages Azure Storage resources, enabling users to upload, download, and control access to data across various storage types.
Pros
- + Comprehensive management of Azure Storage resources.
- + Cross-platform capability, enhancing versatility.
- + Simplifies data handling with easy upload and download features.
Cons
- - Lack of source code transparency as noted by the community.
- - No auto-updates, potentially leading to versioning issues.
Proton Drive
Proton Drive offers end-to-end encrypted cloud storage, with a focus on privacy and security. The macOS client integrates seamlessly with Apple devices, benefiting users seeking secure cloud solutions.
Provides a client for Proton Drive, enabling secure, encrypted cloud storage access on macOS.
Pros
- + Strong focus on security with end-to-end encryption
- + Open-source code builds trust and allows community contributions
- + Available across multiple platforms, including iOS and Android
Cons
- - Low GitHub engagement and community activity
- - Limited install count indicating relatively low adoption