Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer vs Arq
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer
7.0Explorer for Azure Storage
Arq
8.0Multi-cloud backup application
| Metric | Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer | Arq |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Cloud & Storage | Cloud & Storage |
| AI Score | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 481 | 102 |
| 90-day Installs | 1.3K | 272 |
| 365-day Installs | 4.8K | 885 |
| Version | 1.43.0 | 7.40.2 |
| Auto-updates | No | Yes |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 433 | 657 |
| GitHub Forks | 91 | 128 |
| Open Issues | 581 | 6 |
| License | CC-BY-4.0 | — |
| Language | — | C |
| Last GitHub Commit | 2mo ago | 4y ago |
| First Seen | May 24, 2016 | Oct 14, 2012 |
Reviews
Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer
Microsoft Azure Storage Explorer is a powerful tool for managing Azure Storage resources, offering comprehensive features for uploading, downloading, and controlling access to data. It benefits developers and cloud administrators by providing an intuitive interface for handling various storage types, including blobs, files, queues, tables, and VM disks.
Manages Azure Storage resources, enabling users to upload, download, and control access to data across various storage types.
Pros
- + Comprehensive management of Azure Storage resources.
- + Cross-platform capability, enhancing versatility.
- + Simplifies data handling with easy upload and download features.
Cons
- - Lack of source code transparency as noted by the community.
- - No auto-updates, potentially leading to versioning issues.
Arq
Arq is a robust multi-cloud backup application that offers fast and reliable data protection for macOS users. It supports backing up to various cloud storage services, making it ideal for users seeking a comprehensive and efficient backup solution.
Arq backs up files to multiple cloud storage services such as Amazon S3, Glacier, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
Pros
- + Supports multiple cloud storage services
- + Known for fast backup and restore speeds
- + Reliable and widely used among macOS users
Cons
- - Development activity has slowed in recent years
- - License information is unclear