Mendeley Reference Manager vs EndNote
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
Mendeley Reference Manager
8.0Research management tool
EndNote
7.0Reference manager
| Metric | Mendeley Reference Manager | EndNote |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Education |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 48 | 34 |
| 90-day Installs | 136 | 88 |
| 365-day Installs | 514 | 342 |
| Version | 2.144.0 | 22.3.0.22265,2025 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | — | — |
| GitHub Forks | — | — |
| Open Issues | — | — |
| License | — | — |
| Language | — | — |
| Last GitHub Commit | — | — |
| First Seen | Sep 26, 2019 | Oct 1, 2014 |
Reviews
Mendeley Reference Manager
Mendeley Reference Manager is a comprehensive tool for researchers, offering features like reference management, PDF organization, and collaboration. It helps streamline academic workflows, making it ideal for scholars and students.
Mendeley Reference Manager organizes academic references and PDFs, facilitating research management and collaboration.
Pros
- + Free to use for basic features
- + Organizes and stores PDFs alongside references
- + Collaboration tools for academic teams
- + Integrates with various research platforms
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Can be resource-intensive
EndNote
EndNote is a powerful reference management tool designed for researchers and academics. It offers robust citation management, PDF annotation, and seamless integration with academic databases. Its maturity and strong feature set make it a go-to choice for serious research work.
EndNote helps users organize and cite research sources, manage PDFs, and integrate with academic databases.
Pros
- + Comprehensive citation management features
- + Advanced PDF annotation and organization tools
- + Strong integration with academic databases and libraries
- + Mature and reliable software
- + Popular among researchers and academics
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Somewhat niche appeal
- - Limited recent community discussion