LTspice vs WaveForms
Side-by-side comparison for macOS
LTspice
8.0SPICE simulation software, schematic capture and waveform viewer
WaveForms
7.0Virtual instrument suite for Digilent Test and Measurement devices
| Metric | LTspice | WaveForms |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools | Developer Tools |
| AI Score | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| 30-day Installs | 98 | 47 |
| 90-day Installs | 281 | 118 |
| 365-day Installs | 1.1K | 142 |
| Version | 17.2.4 | 3.25.1 |
| Auto-updates | No | No |
| Deprecated | No | No |
| GitHub Stars | 276 | 59 |
| GitHub Forks | 68 | 19 |
| Open Issues | - | 5 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Last GitHub Commit | 6mo ago | 1y ago |
| First Seen | Mar 3, 2014 | Jan 8, 2026 |
Reviews
LTspice
LTspice is a powerful and widely-used SPICE simulation tool for analog circuit design, offering schematic capture, simulation, and waveform analysis. Its free availability and extensive features make it a favorite among engineers and hobbyists for circuit design and testing.
LTspice allows users to simulate analog circuits, create schematics, and analyze waveforms for circuit design and testing.
Pros
- + Free and widely adopted by engineers and hobbyists
- + Comprehensive features for circuit simulation and analysis
- + Active community and regular updates ensure reliability and support
Cons
- - No auto-update feature may require manual checks for new versions
- - While the GitHub community is active, there are few open issues, possibly indicating limited ongoing community contribution
WaveForms
WaveForms is a virtual instrument suite designed for Digilent Test and Measurement devices, offering a comprehensive solution for engineers and researchers. It provides a wide range of tools for device interaction, making it particularly useful for those working with specific hardware.
WaveForms controls and interacts with Digilent's Test and Measurement devices through virtual instruments.
Pros
- + Open-source with an MIT license
- + Supports various instruments via SDK
- + Python-based for developer familiarity
- + Active development and updates
Cons
- - No auto-update feature
- - Niche appeal limiting widespread adoption
- - Open issues may affect functionality